Відео

🖖😎👍The Typhon class truly looks more like it Totally belongs more in the Star Wars universe than in the Star Trek universe with its odd stocky shape and total boxy look of it with just having 4 warp nacelles added to it!🤔?.

Honestly, fighter craft engaging ships and other small craft look cool, and that's really all the justifaction Star Trek needs to have fighter craft. As for tactical logic, look at how well clunky Maquis raiders did against Galor class ships - the Cardassians didn't defeat them until the Dominion arrived with overwhelming force.

Is it just me, or does it look like the back part with the warp engines can detach and warp out in case of danger?

21:01 Maybe they’re side escape pods (or escape pod stacks). You wouldn’t see such on thing on most Federation ships where the hull sections are relatively flat (and so the escape pods are only above or below), but on a ship this thick, the sides become valid areas to tuck them away.

Where is the bridge ?

It’s about Time to extend the 4 Nascelles take a Nebula Class Saucer Section and make a stunning Dreadnoght out of it !

The tycoon class I hate being replacement tires in quadruple recovery day however consider long-range saddles can be launched from launch bays so maybe you don't need that many escape pods

I like the design, but i think it would be cooler as a defiant-like ship. A big package in a small size. Like it is now its m8re like a power fantasy.

15:36 One of my many criticisms of the Intrepid’s unnecessary moving nacelles. When it’s at warp, the nacelles are up and the bussard collectors are behind the saucer section. Well done (sarcasm)! Love the Typhon though I do, that is a point against it.

It's not a normal Starfleet design because it was designed a mobile starbase. The Valkyries also do have a warp drive I believe they can go up to warp 5

A vessel of this size and type would be more suited as a mobile base and heavy resupply vessel. Beyond that, it could easily host Maquis and Bajoran vessels, which are typically the size of large shuttles, not to mention serving a shuttle repair platform, if not a mobile starship repair platform. As an aside, a "fighter" class in STAR TREK wouldn't be the same as a "fighter" from, let's say, STAR WARS. In fact, I would think that a fighter class from the movie THE LAST STAR FIGHTER is more appropriate in a STAR TREK environment.

6:03 Yes, the Valkyries had warp engines. At the start of multiple missions, you can be seen warping to the site of the mission in a nearby star system, and during play, they act as a generic speed boost (and you can even warp backwards!).

I have both(still). STO version is turrets + 1 dual and torps build.

The design doesn't seem to care about engineering's bussard collectors working efficiently.

Typhon - the great king of monsters who battled Zeus for control of the cosmos. Not, typhoon; the sea storm. May you all were thinking of the typhoon as in the NATO designation did the Russian Akula-class super submarine 🤔

Why are y’all saying typhoon like the storm? It’s typhon (tie-fon) or say it quick (tie-fun). Y’all should scrap and redo the whole video

If MACO had survived into the 24th-century I'd see the Typhon & it's fighters assigned to them, a military arm of the Federation. It's definitely a unique design, but damn its a brick. The one big downside to this design, the bussards are chocked off.

What a beautiful, cool, fantastic ship

I'm give up some typical Star Trek ship saucer design where each crew member has a nice cabin with a window looking out into space and I'm going to do a combat brick where you don't get half your ship accessories dropped after one random hit through the shield.

I have to wonder if, like the refitted 1701, when it was traveling at impulse speed, the deflector was a subdued bronze color, but once it was at warp, it changed to the fan-favorite brilliant blue. With this in mind, would it be the same for the 1701-E?

to be fair it didnt really lack guns, as you see in a later episode that when he grows up he literally grows more main canons. Obviously its a alt universe but it make sense as leviathans get bigger. But to be fair one cannon he has is usually enough with how powerful it was.

it has pulse phaser turrets emplacements and quantum torpedo launchers and , 300 crew warp factor 7 maximum 9.2 emergency 9.5 , and 28 fighters they have a squad of pilots number is unknown

Seeing this ship really makes me wonder how much work it take to convert the Horner shipyards 1/1400 Titan-a into the shangri-la

Right with you Cpt Foley I was hoping when I saw it that the nacelles only tuck at warp or something, like an Aqarius. I had no idea about this ship. I saw it in Earth orbit at Spacedock and uttered "what in the hell is that?" lol. The thing on the bottom almost looks like a seperate ship with a capsule forward hull. Like a freighter docked to it. The nose on the ship reminds me of the APU cruiser. The whole vibe is like a Expanse ship. It's very interesting.

We don't know what the fighters look like! Or their capabilities! You'd need several dozen fighters, & backup fighters to make this ship work! Rotate fighter 'wings' when in battle! Taking lots of time repairing damaged, & heavily damaged fighters (automation?)! A ton of supplies dedicated just for fighter operations, micro-torpedos(assuming micro-torpedo launchers on fighters, would be just awesome)(highway to the danger zone intensifying), armor & shields(required), specifically designed impulse engine(s), & possibly more! Not mentioning fighter pilots, their accommodations, & their location to the fighter bay(s) (fast response time)! Pulse phaser gun(s)(just thought of that)?

Honestly, for a "carrier", I would think it's very lacking in firepower! The corners & edges would give the ship the best vantage points for phaser array strips, or just single phasers (in pairs, side-by-side, alternating fire, higher rof)! If they had 2 pairs of torpedoe launchers on opposite sides of the ship's bow, then you'd have good angles for spreading out your firepower! & do the same for the rear of the ship as well! Stacking escape pods would take up alot of room, especially if they are high capacity escape pods! & having then next to your impulse engines (bottom view) isn't a good idea! Since engines are usually targeted, even in Star Trek! The fighter 'launchers' on the bottom, I think would be better if they were angled more forward, towards the battle! However, they should be more protected as they are now! Armor them!! Too exposed to enemy fire! The bottom fighter launchers don't make sense! How do they load them? Elevators...somehow? Tractor beam emitters? Same can be said about the internal ones above!

The Typhon class was designed as a FOB/CARRIER/class. In the consol game it was commanded by Commander Worf it came with an experimental holographic cloak. (reason for the large emitters) Which was effective against long range scans when in hiding. With a max warp of four due to it being staging ship it was transported by ships with higher warp capacity. Its secondary function was Fortress mode in which this state it was unable to launch or dock fighters. In this mode all power was diverted to shields an weapons making it a fortress. The bridge was a CNC section. There was no bridge deck. the bottom hangers were rapid fighter launchers to the standard fighter side bays. It was designed to work with fortress mode for maximum deployment of fighters. On a side note, it was also able deploy covert ops teams. Use a variety of fighters.

1:58:50 commander predicting picard season 3

Honoring one of Roddenberry's rules whilst chucking another out of an airlock with the complete obscuring of the warp nacelles from the front view.

Why not including shoots from the PS1 Cutscenes where you can see this thing hanging on the underside from the E to get a feeling of the size. Thing wasnt that big at all, very compact design

It's taken me years but finally during this video I shouted 'Scorpio'. This ship reminds me of Blake's 7 Scorpio

Please do a vid on the USS Aurora of Aurora Trek! 🖖

It's called the multiverse discovery Terran empire conquer the alpha and beta and gamma quadrants

Keyop was a dodo bird

so 2 things, first once you said it I couldn't unsee it, the phasers do look like solo emitters, what if those odd hexagon things could be solo emitters all over the ship, instead of having long arrays they just have the solo emitters splattered all over for point defense? and second, i always liked the idea of fighters in trek, with capital ships, even the defiant, we always se them follow attack patterns, fighters wouldn't have to do anything of the sort, and the freedom they have to completely fight in 3d space would, or should, make them harder to hit. yes ships have auto targeting systems, but they would have to give lead, and with inertial dampers pilots would be able to make impossible turns and flight capabilities would be off the charts

There wouldn't be a lot more pilots than fighters. Yes pilots would be split into shifts, but if all fighters would be needed, pilots would have to work off shift. And that would be part of their training and expectation of the job if the need arises.

I'm a big fan of the Typhon. Picked it up in STO a couple of days ago and I absolutely love it. As far as design goes, I think it fits the design language of the time. If we look at the Defiant, we can surmise that the Typhon may have originated as a post-Wolf359 anti-Borg force multiplier. Where the Defiant is an "escort," the Typhon is an "escort carrier." Theoretically, it can also serve as an evacuation platform dependent on how much internal volume there is.

Fan canon showcase Typhon as Super massive. I always thought idea Typhon being UNSC infinity esque, where it just comes out of warp, smashes a ship in two by ramming it.

Robotech ship in Star Trek, seen the other too, it's cool but not Star Trek. It's Transformer.

Simple put, I have some counter thoughts, and I mean this in a fun manner; not sweaty nerd hammering on a keyboard manner. XD Some things to consider, a Carrier in Star trek I could see it being used more in ground combat operations. (think airstrikes.) As they wouldn't have a need for massive amounts of ships around the planet. Fighter could provide the limited amount of support a ground unit would need verses the highly destructive weapons a Starship would have. (You wouldn't need a orbital strike from a starship to deal with a small entrenchment, but a Micro torpedo or a couple pulse phaser blasts from a fighter in the combat zone would clear it up nicely.) And as for the lack of escape pods, they could be pulling off a shuttles as the primary means of escape. As often seen getting out of a combat zone is often shown to be devastating to pods survivability. The pods could be there as a secondary method to escape in case of hull breaches preventing people from getting to the hangar bays. As for the concern about crews not having enough pilots, it could be a basic rule where a majority of the crew could have some limited pilot training. Not every pilot has worn a yellow (TOS) or Red uniform. (TMP onwards.) How often have we seen Georgi or the such take a shuttle out on their own. We aren't asking them to provide high even combat maneuvers, but get out of the bay and warp out. Anyways, I'll stop rambling, I hope thing provided some food for thought.

With the escape pods the ship might not need as many because the fighters and shuttles crews might not need to get to pods because of the ship is under attack chanses are fighters are already launched and flight crews would already be in the bays to get to shuttles or runabouts

Fighters would need lock-scramblers [Coded of course] possibly two side drones with extra shield emitters. Analog controls are faster than typing things out like on a bridge or shuttle. Do fighters need NA cells? or is that too Tie Fighter?

Tie fawn.

Fighters are a force multiplier. Even if they aren't as effective as a Odyssey class for a sovereign class. But they can keep the enemy busy like nats bug you in the forest.

do you guys do comissions for making 3d models of ships?

Correct me if I am wrong, but the red part at the front of an engine nacelle is described as a bussard collector. On the normal earth ship configuration, it makes sense that the deflector Shields redirects the matter to those collectors! But what on earth makes a bussard collector buried so deep into a ship. For me, all those fanboys simply put things together without any technical knowledge at all. Not even the star trek pseudo knowledge...

Transformers Decepticon Headmaster Skullcruncher 😊

where does one go to pay to have thier fan ship brought to life?

love the design but prefer the size of the Valkyrie version, 6 nascelles and hanger bays for 2 defiant class ships.

What would a starship look like if Uss Prometheus and uss voyager are combined in one starship without multi vector assault mode. Thoughts?